1 resultado para Structural damage identification
em Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA
Filtro por publicador
- Aberdeen University (8)
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (11)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (7)
- Aquatic Commons (5)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (4)
- Archimer: Archive de l'Institut francais de recherche pour l'exploitation de la mer (1)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (1)
- Aston University Research Archive (17)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (13)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (10)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (8)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (33)
- Brock University, Canada (1)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (3)
- CaltechTHESIS (6)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (31)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (16)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (37)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (2)
- Collection Of Biostatistics Research Archive (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (2)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (6)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (1)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (33)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (1)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (2)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (4)
- DigitalCommons - The University of Maine Research (2)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (10)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (2)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (2)
- Duke University (4)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (5)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (7)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (5)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (2)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (95)
- Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Bragança (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (3)
- National Aerospace Laboratory (NLR) Reports Repository (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (31)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (7)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (60)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (204)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (3)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (4)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (3)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande - FURG (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (104)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín (1)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (2)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (3)
- Universidad de Alicante (7)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (6)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (53)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (2)
- Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP) (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (1)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (2)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (2)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (3)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (13)
- University of Michigan (1)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (12)
- University of Washington (2)
Resumo:
In-stream structures including cross-vanes, J-hooks, rock vanes, and W-weirs are widely used in river restoration to limit bank erosion, prevent changes in channel gradient, and improve aquatic habitat. During this investigation, a rapid assessment protocol was combined with post-project monitoring data to assess factors influencing the performance of more than 558 in-stream structures and rootwads in North Carolina. Cross-sectional survey data examined for 221 cross sections from 26 sites showed that channel adjustments were highly variable from site to site, but approximately 60 % of the sites underwent at least a 20 % net change in channel capacity. Evaluation of in-stream structures ranging from 1 to 8 years in age showed that about half of the structures were impaired at 10 of the 26 sites. Major structural damage was often associated with floods of low to moderate frequency and magnitude. Failure mechanisms varied between sites and structure types, but included: (1) erosion of the channel bed and banks (outflanking); (2) movement of rock materials during floods; and (3) burial of the structures in the channel bed. Sites with reconstructed channels that exhibited large changes in channel capacity possessed the highest rates of structural impairment, suggesting that channel adjustments between structures led to their degradation of function. The data question whether currently used in-stream structures are capable of stabilizing reconfigured channels for even short periods when applied to dynamic rivers.